BASES NEUTRON PHYSICISTS
Valery Feodorovich Andrus
Russian
The table of conversion of chemical elements by V. F. Andrus.
CHAPTER II
Essentials of Neutron Astrophysics
WORK OF FORCE DIRECTED AT AN ANGLE WITH THE MOVEMENT
“If the force direction doesn’t coincide with the movement direction under
conditions, in which the body movement takes place, only part of the applied force,
namely that component coinciding with the movement direction, does the work of the
movement …” (from the textbook “Physics for the secondary technical schools”
D. I. Sakharov, M.I. Bludov, “Nauka”, Moscow, 1969).
Let’s consider an example in Fig. 39.
A body moves upwards on the inclined plane under action of the force of F. As we
see, there are more applied to the body forces, than it is generally assumed by modern
physics. It becomes clear at once, that obtained before results are either rather rough, or
simply assumed with assumptions under agreed basis. Let’s collect all the forces. The
tractive resistance consists of the combination of forces: 
The lifting force is 
Combination of retaining the body against the surface forces is 
The thrust force is 
Let’s consider the simplest case, when the velocity v is constant. It is generally
assumed, that all forces are balanced at the uniform motion, and there, it is very simply to
formulate an equation of the forces. Let’s firstly try to go on that beaten way. Let’s make
extractions from the same textbook of physics: “At the uniform motion of the bar (on the
horizontal surface under action of a plummet weight pulling the bar with the help of a
thread through the small block (the instrument is a tribometer. Author)) Fthrust = Ffrictional …
Experiments with the tribometer show, that frictional force depends on the surface sizes of
the rubbing bodies. We can turn the bar on any of its face – the fractional force will not
change in. A friction coefficient depends on material of the rubbing surfaces, on their
working, on the presence of lubrication between the surfaces. Mean values of a coefficient
of friction of rest are given in the following table:
As it has been already stated, the force of sliding friction (equals to the thrust force
at the uniform motion) is less than maximal force of friction at rest. Therefore and a
coefficient of sliding friction is rather less than a coefficient of friction of rest. Besides of
that, the frictional force and the coefficient of sliding friction depend on the sliding speed
(it is seen from the extraction, as uncompleted notions about nature of phenomena make
introduce new coefficients in every particular case, which all the same are not tenable at
variable motion, because a series of force are not taken into account, which are unknown
at present. Author). … At the uniform motion, the frictional force is the product of force of
normal pressure into a coefficient of sliding friction.
It is quite well seen from the above stated, that states of things in physics seems to
be built on unquestionable facts of experiments, and not allowing to sift a kind of the
simplest and well observable phenomenon to the bottom. The ignorance forces scientists
to cut corners and to make a show that they understand something. But it is mere
camouflage and deception basing on the false scientific grounds. We have already
understood, that they cannot explain physics of that phenomenon (friction), because they
don’t know what mass, force, gravitation, and etc. are …
Let’s return to the statement from the extract, that Fthrust = Ffrictional at the uniform
motion, i.e. the system is in equilibrium. Is it really so?
We have known, that any force is a directed energy flow. If two flows balance
each other, nothing will move! It was seen on the starting rocket, which was unable to take
off the ground at the equipoise.
As we see, we obtain two mutually exclusive concept of nature of phenomena and
that and other problems will not be solved quietly and peacefully. Unfortunately, laws and
works of Newton, Einstein, and also of other scientists, as everything primitive and much
earlier, did not bare the test of time, and that is a normal evolutional phenomenon.
In order that the body moved with constant speed, it is necessary, after reaching
the equilibrium of forces, to form in the body such an additional directed energy flow, i.e.
force, which will move through the body with the given constant speed towards the motion
direction.
In our case, the thrust force is directed at an angle with the motion direction. From
there, velocity of the directed energy flow should be more than the body motion velocity.
So the thrust force is combined with two forces: the first one balancing all resistant
forces, and the second one – of motion:
At present we have considered the general formulation of the problem, which
allowed us to sift the two contrary concepts on nature of phenomena, which were considered as simple and clear, that disputes have never occurred on them for ages.
The first Newton’s law (the 17-th century) – the law of inertia reads as follows: at
the absence of actions other bodies, any physical body remains at rest or at uniform
rectilinear motion.
That Newton’s law does not act even in the absolute emptiness, because a body in
the form of mass is also the “absolute emptiness” with linear dimensions, and does not
have inertial properties. The gravitational flow through the body, i.e. energy mass has
inertial property. In order that the body moved with constant speed, it is necessary to apply
additional permanent acting thrust force of motion. Nothing of its own accord will move
into the absolute emptiness because of the absence of outer forces. A body moves only in
case, when the lattice is arched by the gravitational flow, and its arched rotating skipping
ropes repel itself from it. If repulsions of the skipping ropes and deformation of the lattices
do not occur, the motion does not occur.
It was shown in the example about the rocket, that the thrust force should be more
than the resistant forces, and the question was not considered in details lest the reader be
mixed up completely. Now, we have understood, that the “rather more force” is the thrust
force of motion.
Let’s define the force of normal pressure of the moving body on the inclined plane
to start with:
Let’s remain for easiness and by force of habit the coefficient of sliding friction,
though it partially takes into account F1, - fsliding friction. Let’s remember, that the frictional
force consists of two forces: lifting, and resistant ones. In our case, the resistant force is
considered as the frictional force:
Farther, when we learn to operate quite freely with gravitational flows, the science
will abandon the coefficient of friction as not wanted. The thrust force has two component
forces – equilibrium, and motion ones:
Let’s consider attentively how the body moves under action of the gravitational
forces, what should convince everybody of correctness of the produced conclusions. Let’s
have a look once more at the rocket lattice element (Fig.
38). We can see there, how
curved horizontal skipping rope lowering while rotating, rests on the denser gravitational
flow from the side of the combustion chamber and presses on the vertical skipping ropes
through its supports (Hydrogen “cubes”) moving them ahead – upper. In equilibrium, the
Earth’s gravitational flow arches horizontal skipping ropes of the upper half of the rocket
lattice to the side of the combustion chamber, and the combustion chamber gravitational
flow arches the horizontal skipping ropes of the lower half of the rocket lattice to the side
of its nose. In order that the rocket began moving, it is necessary to compact the
combustion chamber gravitational flow, by burning more fuel. Compacting the flow will
lead to more arching the horizontal skipping ropes of the rocket tail-end and to more
moving ahead – upper its vertical skipping ropes. The conditional plane of the
gravitational flows running out on the sides of the rocket will move upper towards its nose.
What has the displacement of the conditional plane of the flows running out led to? If in
the equilibrium state, we had two counteracting each other parts of the rocket airframe,
while moving the rocket airframe divided into three parts, the two parts of them balance
each other, and the third is quasi free and makes rocket movement under action of the
energy flow through its lattice.
Let’s reckon up: the main conclusion consists in that, the body movement is
possible only at presence of the gravitational flow through its lattice, from which the body
concaved skipping ropes repel themselves. The gravitational flow is a support, from which
the body lattice repels itself towards the flow. The body lattice does not have any support
for repelling in the temporary absolute emptiness, and by that reason, bodies are unable to
move in it.
What is the practical value of that, as it would seem, theoretical question? If the
rocket nose is built from the material with its lattice near to the Lithium lattice size, two
problems will be solved: the first one – practically resistance to the Earth’s gravitational
flow will collapse – it will unable to pass through the rocket, and almost the whole engine
thrust will be spent on the useful load; the second one – cosmonauts won’t feel G-effect,
because practically it will not there. New world outlook will allow designing spacecraft
and launching vehicles in a new fashion.
Let’s return to the uniformly moving bar on the inclined plane and the pulling
force applied at an angle with the motion direction. Work will equal in the old treatment
(refinement of the work notion will be done in item  )
As in case with the rocket, F″thrust consists of two forces.
Work on the energy conservation, i.e. forces is produced mainly with the help of
the energy mass as well. In that particular case, only small part of the directed
gravitational flows achieves necessary density for forming structured energy carriers, and
the rest part of the energy flows is conserved in increasing excitation of a lattice of the
body and atmosphere gases, i.e. in its heating.
WRITE LETTER TO AUTHOR
upwards
|
